Auto Dealers Disappointed That U.S. And Korea Unable to Work Out Auto Trade Differences
1 October 1997
Auto Dealers Disappointed That U.S. And Korea Unable to Work Out Auto Trade DifferencesWASHINGTON, Oct. 1 -- Today, in accordance with U.S. trade law, the United States Trade Representative (USTR) unveiled its annual Super 301 list of priority countries who engage in trade practices, which, if eliminated, would result in a significant increase in U.S. exports. At the same time, the USTR announced that it will initiate within the next few weeks a Section 301 investigation concerning Korea's auto trade practices. The American International Automobile Dealers Association (AIADA) had discouraged the USTR from taking unilateral action against Korea in the auto sector because of the potential harmful impact it could have on the American businesses that sell and service Korean-nameplate automobiles, their American employees and American consumers. "It is unfortunate that the U.S. and Korea could not resolve this dispute on a mutually agreeable basis," AIADA President Walter Huizenga said. "Even though Korean imports account for less than 1 percent of the U.S. market, Korean cars offer U.S. consumers with a valuable choice in the entry level segment, and we hope that today's action does not stigmatize these very cars in the U.S. marketplace," Huizenga added. "It is ironic that those consumers who are least able to afford price increases, which are the all-too-common result of these government actions, will be those most directly impacted." AIADA represents the more than 1O,000 American-owned small businesses that sell and service international nameplate automobiles and their nearly 350,000 employees. SOURCE American International Automobile Dealers Association